University of Chicago economist David Galenson recognized two categories of innovators in his research: conceptual and experimental.

Conceptual innovators are known for pursuing daring new ideas and making significant achievements early in life.

Consider Mozart and all of the wonderful classical works he composed as a young child. There is a role for such creative geniuses in the wider world. Still, as we all know, prodigies are extremely rare in business.

Experimental innovators are more prevalent. To gradually build up to breakthroughs, these innovators utilize iterative, trial-and-error techniques. Experimental innovators are tenacious and prepared to embrace failure and setbacks as part of the learning process.

"If I find ten thousand ways something won't work, I haven't failed," Thomas Edison famously stated. "I'm not discouraged because every wrong attempt discarded is just one more step forward."

Edison was a trailblazer who experimented with new ideas.

Experimental innovators do things to learn what they should do, rather than building comprehensive blueprints to forecast their success. They achieve exceptional success by making a succession of "Little Bets," as Peter Sims refers to them.

Little Bets is built on the idea that we may recognize opportunities and build up to great outcomes by making many small bets and using specific innovative approaches.

The Amazon culture thrives on experimentation.

Employees are encouraged to attempt new things and generate fresh ideas regularly. The company's aim of provoking this is so essential that employees are achieving it is a component of their performance assessments.

Amazon's method of exploring ideas in new areas is sometimes compared to "planting seeds" or "going down blind alleys," according to Jeff Bezos, the company's founder, president, CEO, and chairman (wow!). They pick up new skills and discover new possibilities as they go.

Amazon makes little bets.

Lesson 1: Affordable Losses

‍

Scientific management, the dominant style of management that emerged throughout the industrial period, broke occupations down into precise, sequential tasks that could then be assigned suitable completion durations to maximize efficiency.

Henry Ford was able to simplify vehicle production using these approaches, changing manufacturing and later the service industry.

However, focusing on linear systems, control, unwavering efficiency, and eliminating failure provides little space for creative experimentation and trial and error.

Unfortunately, most of what we would like to anticipate are unexpected, and uncertainty is growing increasingly prevalent as the world becomes more complex.

As a result, one of the most significant flaws of the top-down, central planning method is how it restricts our capacity to be flexible and discover new ways of doing things.

No one can divert their attention away from their primary business or duties. Still, everyone can devote some of their time and energy to discovering, testing, and improving new ideas.

Instead of estimating what they anticipate to earn, great entrepreneurs define what they are prepared to lose when attempting new things.

Using Little Bets adheres to the idea of a manageable loss. It allows us to build progressively on success as we go forward with a concept. Of course, the topic of manageable losses brings up a significant issue with the small bets approach. It's unavoidable that you will experience failure.

Innovators that achieve success tend to embrace failure as both unavoidable and beneficial. They have a development mindset and approach it with a growth mindset.

Lesson 2: Growth Mind-sets

‍

According to Sims, there are two sorts of mindsets.

People with fixed mindsets are too preoccupied with gaining affirmation, focusing on grades, titles, or recognition. Those with a growth mindset, on the other hand, think that their talents can be improved through work and see setbacks as opportunities for improvement.

To understand more about this topic, see our overview of Carol Dweck's book Mindset.

Having a development mindset does not imply that you are unconcerned about failure. We may train ourselves to view setbacks and mistakes in a new light, seeing them as chances for learning and progress.

Little Bets allows us to let go of the notion that we should know everything we need to know before we start. Rather than planning, I'm concentrating on doing. Rather than attempting to forecast dangers and hazards with precision, learn about them.

Lesson 3: Experimental Prototyping

Prototypes, the rougher, the better, can aid in overcoming the blank-page dilemma, the sensation we get when confronted with a need for creativity — writer's block.

Our Little Bets strategy allows us to assess the appropriateness of our product or service using prototypes. It enables us to fail quickly.

If we haven't spent much emotionally, or in terms of time or money, in creating a concept, we are more likely to focus on what we can learn from it rather than what we've lost in the process.

Figuring out ways to fail fast, to invest less emotion and time in any given concept, prototype, or piece of labor, is a challenge in and of itself.

Sims offers us three useful strategies: Plussing, Playing, and Smallifying.

Lesson 4: Smallifying:

"Constraints shape and focus problems and provide clear challenges to overcome." Google's VP of Location and Local Services, Marissa Mayer said.

Constraints are used by productively creative individuals to focus their attention and identify a set of problems that need to be solved. Constraints can assist in creating structure, although they aren't always straightforward to apply. It requires practice to be able to use restrictions successfully.

Constraints are obviously enforced from the outside in some sectors, such as architecture. In certain sectors, the possibilities appear to be endless. The aim is to break down a big project or objective into smaller issues to address, limiting the scope of the effort to first fixing one problem, then another.

Smallifying is a term coined by Bing Gordon, a co-founder and former Chief Creative Officer of Electronic Arts's video game firm.

Gordon discovered at Electronic Arts that software teams working on longer-term projects were inefficient and followed needless pathways.

Developers were more creative and successful when work responsibilities were broken down into issues to be addressed, activities that were both doable and could be completed in one or two weeks.

Agile development will be recognizable to anyone experienced with software development. According to Sims, adopting Agile concepts focusing on small, manageable chunks of work and precisely defined challenges may assist any organization.

The process of meticulously smallifying problems is freeing, given the anxiety or hesitation, we frequently face while striving to unleash our creativity.

The smallifying process facilitates more efficient growth and encourages faster learning and is an excellent way to fail quickly.

Lesson 5: Immersion

‍

Throwing away the theory and experiencing things first-hand is one of the finest methods to find creative breakthroughs and create ideas.

"No facts exist inside the building, only opinions," says Steve Blank, creator of the software startup E.piphany and entrepreneurship professor at Berkeley's Haas School of Business.

There is a substantial relationship between curiosity and creative output, according to research. Sims mentions research that discovered numerous "patterns of action" or "discovery skills" that differentiate innovators from non-innovators.

In addition to experimenting, innovators use observing, inquiring, and networking with people from various walks of life. All of these talents may be improved.

The innovators profiled were also insatiable questioners, constantly striving to question the existing quo by posing "what if," "why?" and "why not?" inquiries. They avoid being swayed by the status quo prejudice.

Immersion is a method of testing one's preconceptions and gaining a broader perspective. It enhances variety in terms of viewpoints, experiences, and backgrounds. It encourages innovation.

Lesson 6: Plussing and Playing

‍

Let's take Pixar as an example of a successful digital animation firm.

Pixar uses a technique known as plussing frequently throughout its creative process. The ability to build on and improve ideas without using judgemental language is known as plussing.

Finding and expanding on the positive parts, rather than criticizing a concept as its whole (even if you don't believe it's good), fosters growth. Plussing enables both criticism and positive comments to be given simultaneously, yet in a way that does not deflate criticism.

Pixar's Victor Navone said, "You always want to present your ideas constructively and be respectful of the other animator's feelings. I usually start my suggestions with 'what if' or 'would it be clearer if.' Creating an atmosphere where ideas are constantly being plussed, while maintaining a sense of humor and playfulness is a central element in doing it this way."

In the same way that plussing welcomes healthy perfectionism, establishing an atmosphere that allows for fun may enhance the amount and quality of group discussions. Humour has also been shown to boost trust levels.

When ideas are incubating and newly born, a fun, cheerful, and delightful setting is beneficial. This is the stage when they are most sensitive to being snuffed out or even voiced due to fear of being evaluated or restricted by the boss.

Putting it all together: Small Wins

‍

Sims believes that we will see tiny victories if we start using these approaches to generate new ideas, tactics, and initiatives.

It's possible to narrow down the meaning of a "small win" to "a concrete, complete, implemented outcome of moderate importance."

They are tiny victories that arise due to our ongoing growth process, and we must keep an eye out for them. They function as landmarks, and they may either affirm that we're on the right track or act as pivot points, indicating how to alter direction.

On the other hand, small victories do not occur in a clean, sequential, linear fashion, with each step bringing you closer to a set objective. Small victories are more typically dispersed and only align in the sense that they go in the same general direction.

Pixar's development as a recognized animated film business is one of the greatest instances of how a succession of minor successes impacted a firm's progress.

Pixar began as a computer hardware firm, attempting to establish a market for their Pixar Image Computer.

When Steve Jobs became engaged with Pixar, just 120 of the gadgets had been sold. The animation crew was the only one that began to show potential.

Management demonstrated the usefulness of computer-generated animation films in a succession of minor successes. This allowed them to impress Steve Jobs sufficiently for him to continue to back their efforts.

They offered a series of short films, claiming to help Pixar's other goods sell better. Lux Jr., the first short film produced after Steve Jobs purchased Pixar in 1986, was hailed as a major achievement, particularly for its emotional authenticity.

Because of its success, Jobs agreed to let John Lasseter and his team produce another short film, Red's Dream.

Toy Story came about due to a series of little bets, and Pixar grew into one of the most successful feature filmmakers of all time.

You may learn a lot from Pixar (and other incredible innovators), and you'll be well on your way to that "overnight success" you've always desired.

‍